Forum:Server Pages & server specific info: Difference between revisions
imported>Tlosk's Bot m (Created page with '{{Forumheader|General}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> {{Post | Indent = : | To = | Text = This is sort…') |
imported>Tlosk's Bot m (Created page with '{{Forumheader|General}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> {{Post | Indent = : | To = | Text = This is sort…') |
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 10:01, 15 October 2009
This is sort of related to the discussion of general vs personal pages below, but I thought it should have its own discussion.
when I first put up some guidelines for restricting personal pages, I did so because someone had created a page for their allegiance. My reasoning for this was because 1) I thought allegiance pages were mostly irrelevant as general info, 2) I didn't want allegiances from different servers with the same name competing for a common name (like Defenders of Light or some other generic high fantasy sounding guild) and 3) I didn't want actual in-game factions, existing or in the future, to have to compete for the same name as a guild.
Now more recently, there was a discussion on personal vs general pages, started because of Connor the Craftmaster's posting of his adventures as their own page. That discussion so far has concluded that personal pages for entertainment, such as connor's adventures or my fan-fiction, should be placed on the author's user page, under the format User:User Name/Article (example: User:An Adventurer/Character Back-stories).
This gave me the idea that we could do the same thing for server pages. For example: the page Leafcull would be a general description page of the server. The page Leafcull/Allegiances would be a listing of allegiances on LC. the page Leafcull/Allegiances/The Trues would be a guild specific page for my current allegiance, The Trues.
I think this would be a good solution for resolving possible name conflicts. I have no opinion on whether or not the info would be useful though. What does everyone else think? Would allegiance pages be good information to have up?--An Adventurer 18:54, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
I think it's a good idea. I think the wiki is served by recording not just objects but to record history of the players and allegiances also. --Tlosk 18:57, 24 May 2009 (UTC)