Talk:Dungeons: Difference between revisions
imported>Tlosk No edit summary |
imported>An Adventurer mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
cool good idea. | |||
--[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] 17:12, 27 February 2008 (CST) | |||
---- | |||
--[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 18:18, 23 February 2008 (CST)Some of the letters have a lot fewer dungeons than other letters so I thought it might be a good idea to combine a few of the categories to get a shorter index that's easier to see all at once. (I based the number of dungeons per letter based on all available dungeons, not just the ones there's currently entries for.) | --[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 18:18, 23 February 2008 (CST)Some of the letters have a lot fewer dungeons than other letters so I thought it might be a good idea to combine a few of the categories to get a shorter index that's easier to see all at once. (I based the number of dungeons per letter based on all available dungeons, not just the ones there's currently entries for.) | ||
Regarding both the table and the index, I think it's very useful to have both as it's nice to browse dungeons based on characteristics as well. But I added a link to the index at the top (since at any given time there will usually be some dungeons that have entries but haven't been added to the list here yet). | |||
--[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] 11:42, 28 November 2007 (CST) So, I added a dungeon index and table like on the NPC page, and again the navigation menu has been bumped down to the bottom of the page, at least for my browser. adding just the index was fine, but when I added the table thats what screwed up the nav menu. | --[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] 11:42, 28 November 2007 (CST) So, I added a dungeon index and table like on the NPC page, and again the navigation menu has been bumped down to the bottom of the page, at least for my browser. adding just the index was fine, but when I added the table thats what screwed up the nav menu. | ||
Latest revision as of 17:12, 27 February 2008
cool good idea.
--An Adventurer 17:12, 27 February 2008 (CST)
--Tlosk 18:18, 23 February 2008 (CST)Some of the letters have a lot fewer dungeons than other letters so I thought it might be a good idea to combine a few of the categories to get a shorter index that's easier to see all at once. (I based the number of dungeons per letter based on all available dungeons, not just the ones there's currently entries for.)
Regarding both the table and the index, I think it's very useful to have both as it's nice to browse dungeons based on characteristics as well. But I added a link to the index at the top (since at any given time there will usually be some dungeons that have entries but haven't been added to the list here yet).
--An Adventurer 11:42, 28 November 2007 (CST) So, I added a dungeon index and table like on the NPC page, and again the navigation menu has been bumped down to the bottom of the page, at least for my browser. adding just the index was fine, but when I added the table thats what screwed up the nav menu.
Anyway. what does everyone think? Are both the table and the index needed?
One idea I had would be to sort of combine the two, and contain all the information on just 1 page. The Dungeon page could be divided into a subsection for each letter, with each subsection containing one of the tables. And at the top and bottom of the page we could stick a little index which redirects the person to the appropriate letter on the page.
--An Adventurer 12:02, 28 November 2007 (CST) Since there was no information in the table or index yet, I removed them and added my idea. We can always go back to the table and index being seperate, but this way we can actually see what it looks like. If you guys like it, we could make the same change to the NPC page.