Forum:Titles in Patch Page (Atarax Jan 2009): Difference between revisions

From Drunkapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
imported>Tlosk's Bot
m (Created page with '{{Forumheader|General}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> {{Post | Indent = | Text = I noticed all the ''Fu…')
 
imported>Tlosk's Bot
m (Created page with '{{Forumheader|General}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> {{Post | Indent = | Text = I noticed all the ''Fu…')
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 09:39, 15 October 2009

Forums: Index
General
Forum:Titles in Patch Page (Atarax Jan 2009)

I noticed all the Future Titles in the Current_Patch#New_Titles section. I guess this is from the hacked client data, but do you think we should include this in the Current Patch? I think it will become confusing because people will think that's when those titles were actually available. --Atarax 01:51, 24 January 2009 (CST)

To: Atarax
Personally I think they should go there as long as they are labeled as such, it helps a lot in trying to discover new content (although in this particular case we know it won't be for a while until some of them are actually available in game). Also it is useful historically in knowing when something was actually added. So as long as the labeling is clear, I think it's more helpful than not. --Tlosk 08:35, 24 January 2009 (CST)