Talk:Northwatch Castle: Difference between revisions
From Drunkapedia
imported>Atarax No edit summary |
imported>Tlosk No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think we should delete the ''Ownership'' pages for both Northwatch castle and freebooter keep. There really is no point in having it, especially since it will never be reliably updated. Anyone object to this? --[[User:Atarax|Atarax]] 13:28, 12 January 2009 (CST) | I think we should delete the ''Ownership'' pages for both Northwatch castle and freebooter keep. There really is no point in having it, especially since it will never be reliably updated. Anyone object to this? --[[User:Atarax|Atarax]] 13:28, 12 January 2009 (CST) | ||
:Yeah, when they first came out there was no way of knowing how fast they would nosedive, now they go days and days unclaimed. Now they just look bad because they are so incomplete. Just be sure to check for anything that links to them to remove the link. Would be nice if Turbine added an in game way of checking ownership like you can for open villas. I hate running out to Freebooter only to have it unclaimed or changed hands. --[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 15:50, 12 January 2009 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 15:50, 12 January 2009
I think we should delete the Ownership pages for both Northwatch castle and freebooter keep. There really is no point in having it, especially since it will never be reliably updated. Anyone object to this? --Atarax 13:28, 12 January 2009 (CST)
- Yeah, when they first came out there was no way of knowing how fast they would nosedive, now they go days and days unclaimed. Now they just look bad because they are so incomplete. Just be sure to check for anything that links to them to remove the link. Would be nice if Turbine added an in game way of checking ownership like you can for open villas. I hate running out to Freebooter only to have it unclaimed or changed hands. --Tlosk 15:50, 12 January 2009 (CST)