User talk:Immortalbob: Difference between revisions

From Drunkapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
imported>Tlosk's Bot
mNo edit summary
imported>Tlosk
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Thanks for all the great contributions, you've been given sysop status which will allow you to make deletions, edit protected pages and skip captchas. --[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 14:27, 28 April 2009 (CDT)
I'd just leave them all on the same page. There's a few others like that and if they're all the same type of item but belong to different quests you can break them apart that way but when they are all for the same quest it's better to just have them on one page with differentiating details outlined. Similar to how we have retired items on the same page as their current version. --[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 02:43, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 
Yeah, I put a notice up on  the [[Mediawiki 1.14 Changes|update page]], I found the problem and am in the final testing of the repair on a test machine. I should have it finished within a half hour or so on the wiki server. --[[User:Tlosk's Bot|Tlosk's Bot]] 04:45, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 
:The table has been successfully repaired, if you come across a broken page, click History, click on the most recent (top most) version, click edit and save. (Before the repair any versions in the affected date range would come up empty). I believe this will only be true for pages that have been visited in the last two days, any page from the affected range that wasn't visited yet should come up normally without having to resave. --[[User:Tlosk's Bot|Tlosk's Bot]] 05:06, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:43, 27 May 2009

I'd just leave them all on the same page. There's a few others like that and if they're all the same type of item but belong to different quests you can break them apart that way but when they are all for the same quest it's better to just have them on one page with differentiating details outlined. Similar to how we have retired items on the same page as their current version. --Tlosk 02:43, 28 May 2009 (UTC)