Talk:Quest Guide Template: Difference between revisions
From Drunkapedia
imported>An Adventurer (New page: --~~~~ good idea sticking quest rewards on the page. and we can just copy the same code for the armor/weapon/item's individual page.) |
imported>An Adventurer No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'd like to decide on a single style when it comes to the dialog from quests. | |||
Style 1: [[Search for Gareth Dain]] | |||
<br>dialog and walkthru are seperate sections. | |||
Style 2: [[The Temple of Hizk Ri]] | |||
<br>dialog is inserted in the walkthru but indented. | |||
I like both styles. Style one gives you a nice, short, clear guide, but the dialog section is a bit confusing unless things are labeled clearly. Style 2 makes a quick cut and paste of the guide not possible, but it makes it much easier to follow the dialog. And having it indented makes it easy enough to skip over if you are just reading the guide. What does everyone else think? | |||
--[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] 10:26, 18 June 2008 (CDT) | |||
---- | |||
Revision as of 09:26, 18 June 2008
I'd like to decide on a single style when it comes to the dialog from quests.
Style 1: Search for Gareth Dain
dialog and walkthru are seperate sections.
Style 2: The Temple of Hizk Ri
dialog is inserted in the walkthru but indented.
I like both styles. Style one gives you a nice, short, clear guide, but the dialog section is a bit confusing unless things are labeled clearly. Style 2 makes a quick cut and paste of the guide not possible, but it makes it much easier to follow the dialog. And having it indented makes it easy enough to skip over if you are just reading the guide. What does everyone else think?
--An Adventurer 10:26, 18 June 2008 (CDT)