Category talk:Item: Difference between revisions
From Drunkapedia
imported>Zenodice (tlosk and an adventurer please see this) |
imported>Tlosk No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think we should consider recategorizing many of the items in this list, items such as [[Smooth Rocks]] for example could be tagged as <nowiki>[[Category:Object]]</nowiki> which would | I agree, the Item category is ripe for some additional subcategories, it's so huge that it's kind of become a catchall when something needs some sort of categorization. An Adventurer will have some good input I'm sure, he's done a lot of the work on developing new categories. --[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 19:17, 11 September 2008 (CDT) | ||
---- | |||
I think we should consider recategorizing many of the items in this list, items such as [[Smooth Rocks]] for example could be tagged as <nowiki>[[Category:Object]]</nowiki> which would separate items located in dungeons that cannot actually be obtained but are usable or readable. This would apply to numerous items in this list which are not so much items as usable objects on the landscape or in dungeons. --[[User:Sanguis|Sanguis]] 13:19, 11 September 2008 (CDT) | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 18:17, 11 September 2008
I agree, the Item category is ripe for some additional subcategories, it's so huge that it's kind of become a catchall when something needs some sort of categorization. An Adventurer will have some good input I'm sure, he's done a lot of the work on developing new categories. --Tlosk 19:17, 11 September 2008 (CDT)
I think we should consider recategorizing many of the items in this list, items such as Smooth Rocks for example could be tagged as [[Category:Object]] which would separate items located in dungeons that cannot actually be obtained but are usable or readable. This would apply to numerous items in this list which are not so much items as usable objects on the landscape or in dungeons. --Sanguis 13:19, 11 September 2008 (CDT)